Submittinga text entry box, a media recording, or a file upload
Assignment Overview
Graded Assignment
Guidelines
Connection to Global Competencies, on Critical Thinking
Students will solve meaningful, real-life, complex problems by taking concrete steps to address issues and design and manage projects.
Students will engage in an inquiry process to solve problems as well as acquire, process, interpret, synthesize, and critically analyse information to make informed decisions (i.e., critical and digital literacy).
Students will see patterns, make connections, and transfer what they have learned from one situation to another, including in real world applications.
Connection to Global Competencies, on Collaboration
Students learn from and contribute to the learning of others by co-constructing knowledge, meaning, and content.
Students network with a variety of communities/groups and use an array of technology appropriately to work with others.
0
Rubric
true
660
Can't change a rubric once you've started using it.
All DQs were answered correctly and with insightful detail, beyond what is commonly known. All of the answers included research, all of which were properly cited in APA format.
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThinking/Inquiry96_1732
Student completed the Smarter Science worksheets and demonstrated a good grasp on the scientific method in their lab notebook writeup.
Also A1.8, A1.10
Smarter Science worksheets were completed in insightful detail, and had many original ideas. Hypothesis was in correct format and was clearly explained with research. Results were complete and recorded with much detail. Conclusion includes a statement of whether the results were as expected and includes a brief discussion of why or why not. Discussion was written in insightful detail and included research.
Smarter Science worksheets were completed in good detail, and had original ideas. Hypothesis was in correct format and was clearly explained, with research. Results were complete and recorded clearly. Conclusion includes a statement of whether the results were as expected and includes a brief discussion of why or why not. Discussion was written in good detail and included research.
Smarter Science worksheets were completed in good detail, and had original ideas. Hypothesis was in correct format and was clearly explained. Results were complete and recorded clearly. Conclusion includes a statement of whether the results were as expected and includes a brief discussion of why or why not. Discussion was written in good detail.
Smarter Science worksheets were completed in sufficient detail. Hypothesis was in correct format and was clearly written. Results were complete and recorded clearly. Conclusion includes a statement of whether the results were as expected (was the hypothesis proven or disproven?). Conclusion includes a brief discussion of why or why not.
Smarter Science worksheets were completed with minimal detail. Results were complete, but recorded unclearly. Conclusion includes a statement of whether the results were as expected (was the hypothesis proven or disproven?). Conclusion includes a brief discussion of why or why not.
Smarter Science worksheets were partially completed. Results were incomplete and recorded unclearly. Conclusion includes a statement of whether the results were as expected (was the hypothesis proven or disproven?), but lacked a discussion of why or why not.
All sections in lab notebook were organized and completed in insightful detail. All materials were listed and quantities of reagents were included. Procedure was written in insightful detail, in point form, past tense, third person. Adjustments to the materials list and procedure were included as necessary. More diagrams and photos were included than as outlined, each with detailed captions.
All sections in lab notebook were organized and completed in very good detail. All materials were listed and quantities of reagents were included. Procedure was written in good detail, in point form, past tense, third person. Adjustments to the materials list and procedure were included as necessary. More diagrams and photos were included than as outlined, each with proper captions.
All sections in lab notebook were organized and completed in good detail. All materials were listed and quantities of reagents were included. Procedure was written in good detail, in point form, past tense, third person. Adjustments to the procedure were included as necessary. Diagrams and photos were included as outlined, each with proper captions.
All sections in lab notebook were organized and complete. All materials were listed and quantities of reagents were included. Procedure was written in sufficient detail, in point form, past tense, third person. Diagrams and photos were included as outlined, each with proper captions.
Most sections in lab notebook were organized and complete. Most materials were listed and quantities of reagents were included. Procedure was written in sufficient detail, in point form, past tense, third person. Some diagrams and photos were included as outlined, each with proper captions.
Lab notebook included only some of the required sections, and was disorganized (lacked headings). Procedure was incomplete and written in an incorrect format. Diagrams and pictures were not included.
All DQs were answered correctly and with insightful detail, beyond what is commonly known. All of the answers included research, all of which were properly cited in APA format.
None of the Knowledge DQs were answered, or all of the questions were answered incorrectly. Any research that was included was not properly cited in APA format.
96_2834
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/
20 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeB1.1402296_6522
analyse technological applications related to enzyme activity in the food and pharmaceutical industries (e.g., the production of dairy products; breadmaking; the use of enzymes to control reaction rates in pharmaceuticals)
threshold:
3.0 pts
5to >3.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
96_6919
3to >0.0 pts
Meets Expectations
96_5177
0to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
96_1977
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/
5 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeB3.4403196_2418
describe the chemical structures and mechanisms of various enzymes
threshold:
3.0 pts
5to >3.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
96_6751
3to >0.0 pts
Meets Expectations
96_9560
0to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
96_6534
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/
5 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeA1.8401496_383
synthesize, analyse, interpret, and evaluate qualitative and/or quantitative data to determine whether the evidence supports or refutes the initial prediction or hypothesis and whether it is consistent with scientific theory; identify sources of bias and/or error; and suggest improvements to the inquiry to reduce the likelihood of error
threshold:
3.0 pts
5to >3.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
96_9852
3to >0.0 pts
Meets Expectations
96_2586
0to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
96_6962
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/
5 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeA1.10401696_9396
draw conclusions based on inquiry results and research findings, and justify their conclusions with reference to scientific knowledge
threshold:
3.0 pts
5to >3.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
96_9649
3to >0.0 pts
Meets Expectations
96_9996
0to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
96_613
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/
5 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeA1.11401796_4307
communicate ideas, plans, procedures, results, and conclusions orally, in writing, and/or in electronic presentations, using appropriate language and a variety of formats (e.g., data tables, laboratory reports, presentations, debates, simulations, models)
threshold:
3.0 pts
5to >3.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
96_6709
3to >0.0 pts
Meets Expectations
96_1491
0to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
96_3935
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/
5 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeB2.5402496_5174
plan and conduct an investigation related to a cellular process (e.g., factors that affect enzyme activity; factors that affect transport of substances across cell membranes), using appropriate laboratory equipment and techniques, and report the results in an appropriate format
threshold:
3.0 pts
5to >3.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
96_9173
3to >0.0 pts
Meets Expectations
96_1647
0to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
96_3994
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.